Warsaw Stock Exchange $GPW GPW.WA

Brief write up of the Warsaw stock exchange. I found this and think it is a rather neat idea. It is currently a 5.9% portfolio weight.

Exchanges used to be considered an typical natural monopoly – it’s inefficient to transact across multiple venues – any investor wants to be where the liquidity and best price is.  The Internet changes this, as prices can be advertised electronically  / deals can be done across multiple venues, but it still isn’t quite that simple – there are things such as settlement, regulation, risk and habit which potentially make switching exchanges difficult.

The Warsaw exchange, or GPW is a very profitable organisation with a strong balance sheet that I think has been somewhat overlooked. To summarise, it has a PE of about 9, a yield of over 5% (albeit taxed at 17% as a reader pointed out below).  The balance sheet is very strong – it is a 1.7 PLN bn market cap company with 0.855 bn in tangible assets /  0.59bn net tangible assets.  This is allowing nothing for any intangibles – which for a business such as this is not a sensible thing to do.  Over a third of the market cap is covered by cash / receivables / other assets – putting it on a tangible adjusted PE of c7/8!  (depending exactly on what you think earnings will be).

Many other exchanges are able to function with a level of net debt – so (in theory) a good proportion of their assets are distributable.

And it’s not like margins are weak.  They have net profit margins of around 40% and an EBITDA margin of 50-60%. They are also paying out (a little) – policy is to pay 60% of earnings in dividends.

The company is more diverse than you might think in terms of revenue and earnings streams – it shouldn’t really be thought of as just the Warsaw stock exchange. The commodities which are another big part of the business are mostly electricity trading.

GPW revenue

There are other positives.

  • Poland has been classified as a developed, not emerging market by MSCI – probably reducing volatility flows (a mixed blessing for an exchange).
  • Interactive brokers added the WSE  – a potential source of volume.
  • Poland has a decent economy, fast growth, low debt to GDP – and a market PE of about 10, CAPE of 11.9.
  • The WSE has many non Polish, central European listings.
  • Apparently, due to a local pension reform, 8-17bn PLN is to be put into the market annually.
  • They have / had a tech tie up with NYSE/Euronext – this may facilitate aquisition – as they work on teh same platform.  At the least it could cut costs. Details are hard to find – but some here.

They are cheap and are aware of it – this was posted in January:

GPW Cheap

The weaknesses to my thesis are that this lacks an immediate catalyst.  The votes are 51% controlled by the Polish government (they own 35% of the shares). Poland does go through phases of selling assets so it is possible these could be sold to another player or even on the exchange (though I doubt it at a valuation this low).

The big one is also that CBOE has entered the market (5th Nov 2018).  The stats they publish don’t show much of an impact as yet except, perhaps, in block trades which are massively down. This could prove a catalyst for a sale if they manage to get a hold.  They dont publish stats on their operations that I have been able to find.

The government stake might be a negative for many investors.  I like it, if I have to have a majority shareholder I would rather it be a state/government.  They are less financially motivated than most, they have a reputation they care about.  In the overall scheme of things this is a small amount of money for them.  This leads to the biggest risk – that nothing will happen for several years.  As long as they keep earning and paying out dividends I am reasonably happy to wait.

The value of main market trading is down 18.8% Jan – Dec.  But the index is down 9.5% over the period and, of the decline, 34% is block trades.  I would guess these were relatively low margin and I am not sure what has happened.  I would also draw attention to the strong growth in electricity trading – +129.5%

Competition has been seen across exchanges before – the London Stock Exchange has had competition for years but still a very nice business – they have moved from selling trades to selling more data.

As I conclude I would just like to emphasize how cheap this is.  A potential buyer could pick up / start to pick up a decent blocking stake at these levels, given the dividend, it could easily pay for itself / more than pay for itself.  The LSE has just issued bonds at a rate of 1.75%!

This can be traded directly on the Warsaw stock exchange – which I recommend as some of the earnings flow directly back to me via my holding in this! Or on the London exchange as a GDR (0P2A).  You can buy with Interactive Brokers or (I think possibly Saxobank). As ever, this is not financial advice.

Comments are encouraged!


10 thoughts on “Warsaw Stock Exchange $GPW GPW.WA”

  1. It might be me but how do you get to 855m in tangible assets? As far as I can see in the latest quarterly there’s 853m of shareholder equity which includes 259m of intangibles.

    Also there is 243m in bonds outstanding, did you take that into account? By my quick calculations net cash is 101m + 436m -246m = ~291m pln. I’m having a hard time arriving at a cash-adjusted P/E of 5. TTM is 184m and that includes a one-off gain of 45m on the sale of Aquis. So normalized TTM earnings are ~139m which is roughly in line with previous years.

    Gets me closer to a ~10x cash-adjusted P/E ratio.

    Still quite cheap, still a very interesting idea but I think you paint quite a rosy picture.

    1. Thanks, I didnt take the bonds/liabilities into account. In, part deliberately as many businesses such as this operate with levered balance sheets. But then I got mixed up!

      I have edited that bit as it was wrong and wasn’t quite making the point I wanted to.

      By ‘cash’ I am including all non-intangible assets, which you might want to dispute.

      I am very much looking at a bigger picture – even at your 10 PE it still cheap. One thing I didn’t mention and you may not have seen is their 2020 target of 288m EBITDA.

      Not sure I believe this but worth consideration.

      Click to access Presentation_of_GPW_Strategy_GPW2020.pdf

      1. net income is around 140M. the gain in q2 last year was lapped. that is eps of 3.33.
        so 13PE.

        coming to net cash, note the dividend of 135M is a liability. So remove the debt of 246M and 135M. 380M. Cash was 478M. so about 100M. there are some long term investments as well. they will need that cash and possibly keep the investments to be conservative.

        still interesting…

  2. I like the GPW stock and I’m holding it. But I’d like to comment on the state ownership. I’!m from Poland so have a close look on it. Polish governments don’t have a good history with state controlled companies. The top execs are usually changed every time the governing party changes, the companies’ decisions are often politically driven, the people in government great those companies as the extension of government, not as independent entities. GPW sems actually less affected than the biggest oil (Orlen), banks (PKO BP and Pekao SA) and energy utilities. Perhaps the reason is that Polish banks/brokers are also large shareholders so GPW is more fundamentally driven.

    1. Yes I know the Polish dont like state owned companies and some are appallingly run. (PHN). BUT GPW is in a nice market segment, has the threat of competition so I still think its a decent company.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s